Friday, February 05, 2010

Growth Spurts or Tape Worms...How Can One Little Girl Be So Hungry?

For the last several days, if you were to spend about an hour with my daughter, you would assume that I'm starving her. Her most frequent comment, repeated almost every half hour, is "I'm hungry". It doesn't matter that she ate a bowl of macaroni and cheese plus two apples only twenty minutes ago. This child is starving...constantly.

I find myself thinking back on the last few times I've dared to cook pork and wondering if I thoroughly cooked it but the fact is, my little girl is growing and growing fast. This growth spurt that she's in now will wane and another will come along. It's amazing to me because for eleven years I was the only girl in an all boy's club. Video games, Pokemon, skateboards and rocks were king. I was the lone warrior in keeping the seat down. I'm now thrust into a world of pink, Hannah Montana, a diva attitude and someone who primps more than I do. At three years old, she can flip her hair better than a pageant princess and she seems to know exactly who she is.

You know what? I'm loving every minute of it.

But I also find myself looking at her confidence, her love of life and strength and hoping she won't lose that. What if something or anything happens and changes who she is and her comfort with the world? She believes in princes and princesses. She believes in happily ever after. She blushes when they kiss and she is truly happy. She is secure in her world. I want to hold that for her, to keep her safe, happy and protected from the harsh realities of the world. I want to protect that spirit that all little girls, including me, must surely have had before the world taints their purity. I know I can't keep the bad away from her forever and bad things will just happen but if it's in my power, I'll find a way to protect her from it. In the meantime, I'll paint her nails. I'll listen to her sing for the thousandth time and I'll cherish every pure second of the little miracle that she is. If and when the nastiness of the world finally touches her, I hope she'll at least know that even then, I'll be her biggest defender.

Now excuse me, but I have to go find a snack for "her majesty". She's "hungry"!

Monday, July 20, 2009

Fate?

I realize that my posts are sporadic at best and I can't tell you what  
inspires me to write when I do (well I could on this particular  
occasion but that's probably best kept to myself) but it's better than  
never writing at all, even though I'm fairly certain that when I do  
write here, it's really only for me and the occasional marketer who  
stumbles upon me and thinks, "Hey, this person looks like they want to  
know how to become independently wealthy in just 30 seconds using only  
a computer and a Bobby pin."

But I'm writing none the less and at least someday, if anything  
newsworthy and tragic befalls me, Fox news will have something to  
broadcast to illuminate the inner workings of my mind.

I've spent a lot of time in the last several months contemplating my  
life, where I am and how I got here. I have an amazing family and two  
beautiful, intelligent, witty and independent children. I suppose if  
anything, that may entirely be the only purpose to my life so far. I  
used to say I have no regrets and when it comes to my babies, I don't  
but I find myself wondering how my life might have been different if  
not for a handful of choices I made along the way. That's what life is  
all about really, choices.

 It's not the obvious ones that concern me. I know that I'm a  
stronger person for having made some of the mistakes that I've made  
and I wouldn't have learned the lessons that I had, had I not made  
those choices. It's not the major decisions that others have made that  
directly impacted my own life.

It's the little things like whether or not to turn right or left at a  
specific stop sign, deciding to go out or stay in on a particular  
occasion or whether or not to just simply play a game, like Scrabble or Checkers  
for instance. A lot of times, those seemingly inoccuous choices may  
end up having huge consequences. Perhaps if I had left just a few  
seconds earlier, I would have gotten to a point in the road where a  
driver would have swerved directly into my lane and it would have been  
Goodnight for me.

It's really just musing on my part and I have nothing concrete to  
confirm or deny that any of those choices weren't simply just an act  
of fate. But it does have me wondering where I would be now if not for  
a simple choice I may have made even in high school and for the first  
time in my life, I think I finally feel a little regret for missed  
opportunities. I can't help but wonder what parts of my life might  
have been altered if I hadn't missed them.

So next time your standing in a store line and wondering if you should  
move over to the next one, perhaps take a few more seconds to  
contemplate it. Maybe that one decision could change your life.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Anything for McCain

I have been watching with amusement and disgust over the last several weeks, as Senator McCain and Governor Palin have pulled stunt after stunt in desperate attempts to see the surge in support they briefly experienced after the GOP convention.
From "halting the campaign" to calling Senator Obama a terrorist and then waiting a few days for it to sink in to call off their dogs and on and on and on...

Now the McCain supporters are getting in on the act like 20 year old Ashley Todd, but more importantly, every right-wing nutjob with a blog and online following.

They latched onto the story of this woman's "attack", who was so desperate to gain some sympathy and votes for her chosen candidate (probably dreadfully fearful of having a "terrorist muslim" as our next President as many of the conservatives I've talked to believe) that this sad woman cut up her own face and claimed it was because she supported McCain and Palin.
The "Mavericks" themselves even called the "poor woman's" family. Now, it comes out and she admits she did it to herself and bloggers are printing retractions, some making excuses and others just flat out deleting the blogs like they never even happened. (Example's like this one
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5110975792502927263&postID=9020858208855508716

But what about their commentators?
Jonathan Martin was one of the bloggers who latched onto the story
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1008/Its_getting_ugly_out_there.html?showall"

and these were among the comments. I wanted to start with the first one because he's all over the place with this and like he says "I just copied the text from the comments to post and re-post once the ATM footage comes out" (The footage is out. Foot, meet mouth and I copied YOUR comments.) This is only a sampling of the comments. Many of them were very similar.


************************************************************************************
BTW... I just copied the text from the comments to post and re-post once the ATM footage comes out... Good public relations for Barack. The cutting by the thief was bad but the comments here were worse because they were made by supposedly thoughtful and educated people... Wrong

Posted By: Richard | October 23, 2008 at 06:04 PM

This is exactly why I do not have any McCain yard signs or bumper stickers here in the liberal hotbed of Seattle. It is not safe. I wear my McCain/Palin button only when I don't mind people hating me. Free Speech? Not in Obama land.

Posted By: Shut Up If You're Not For Obama | October 23, 2008 at 05:58 PM
One of the Obama/Ayres footsoldiers, no doubt. Expect more of these Obama/Ayres controlled thugs to be roaming the streets if "The One" steals the election. They will enforce the "Change" that Obama is threatening.

Posted By: Nobama'08 | October 23, 2008 at 06:12 PM
(OMG, Big scary Obama supporters are running amok! Hide your children! Lock the doors!)

Is this all you compassionate libs have to say is that it looks fake because the B is backwards? If he were standing over her with his feet above her head, this is the direction the B would be. What a bunch of classless clueless dems!

Posted By: Richard | October 23, 2008 at 05:43 PM
(Pssst Richard, they weren't classless and clueless. They were smart and savvy. They saw the lie for what it was! How about clueless, desperate conservatives?)

Listen to you people! A woman is attacked, and you say 'it's because of those hateful Republicans.' You have got to be kidding me. Doesn't your Messiah preach a more positive message?

Posted By: Laura | October 23, 2008 at 05:42 PM
(Yes, he teaches us to think. Try it!)

The Obamatons here are truly scum. First you try to excuse the crime by linking it to the McCain campaign, then you claim the victim falsified the crime.

This isn't like some vandalized vans and graffiti. There's an actual human victim here. If evidence turns up that the crime was faked, I'll be appalled and disappointed. But for now, we have no reason to doubt this person.

Really, the fact Obamatons are so partisan they're willing to excuse criminal behavior for their narrow political ends is truly disgusting. I thought we'd started moving beyond the "blame the victim" mentality which ironically the Left was so active in trying to change.

Posted By: I Knew A Phony | October 23, 2008 at 05:27 PM
(I really want to find I Knew A Phony's post where he/she is now appalled and disappointed. I looked, they're strangely silent...)
********************************************************************************

These are the people supporting McCain/Palin. It isn't just Ashley Todd who has mental issues. These people were out in force on the 23rd and they were MAD. So mad that the picture of a woman with a perfect, backwards, scratched 'B' on her face didn't raise one red flag in the areas of their brains that controls common sense.
Why? Because they wanted to believe it. Some of them probably still do.

THIS is why we have to get out and vote on November 4th and if you're in an early voting state, do it now!

Friday, June 20, 2008

Still alive!!

I'd been so busy with a pregnancy, then a new baby and now a very active little toddler, I haven't blogged in a long time. But just a quick note that I'm not gone and still here.
I have a lot to talk about (Why "On Becoming Babywise" should be banned from Babies R Us and other reputable baby stores for one, why the crying it out method is not healthy) yep a lot to discuss as I faced my life being a new mom all over again!

But for now, I just wanted to say "I'm still here!!"

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

www.ex-mormon.org

While watching the new Pope being put into place, I decided to see what google had to say about the Catholics. Being raised LDS, I was completely aware that there were entire factions of people whose main purpose in life was to help "Mormons with Recovery" yet when I googled a church that for hundreds, nay, thousands of years, has changed doctrines, murdered thousands in the name of God, and most recently an epidemic number of child molesters in their hierarchy- no angry ex-Catholics. But Google Mormon and boy is that a different story. The funniest and saddest site I stumbled upon was www.ex-mormon.org Several days later after spending varied periods on the net, digging deeper, reading, visiting other sites, all I have to say is "WHAT??"
This particular website makes claims about the many hits it gets each day, as an indication of how many "disgruntled, disenfranchised" members seeking support there are. I don't think so. First off, I was there several times and each time, I became firmer in my belief than when I started.

I'm not a "Molly Mormon". I was raised in the church but my father was a non-practicing Catholic and my mother was my primary religious influence. My father though, supported my mother in her bringing me up in the church but we weren't zealots. I attended church, primary, camps, etc and I read the scriptures. We prayed before meals and we tried to spend time together as a family. In high school, several members of the church didn't take a liking to my "changing face". I was what you would call a "mod" and didn't have a lot of member friends. I decided that I didn't want to spend time with people whom I felt were hypocrits. Now it would seem that I would be labeled a "jack mormon" and although I drank, smoked and did other things that weren't considered very moral by some who would judge that, I never believed I was a jack. The difference being that I believed in the basic principals of the gospel, even if I didn't like some of its members. I examined the belief systems and practices of other religions, everything from Catholicism to Budha but I always came back to the LDS church. It fit some independent ideas that I felt were true. I became an "active member" again when my son was young but I never really left the church. I brought with me some of the bad habits I picked up in my wilder, younger days (still a smoker sadly) but I found a ward whose members knew this and didn't judge me. I made some very good, often quirky friends here. I had also decided that I was going to run into an idiot now and then, either in church or in the real world (I actually have one idiot in particular in my life right now- a non-member really, well unless this is what she is pretending to be today, maybe. You never know what fantasy this chick will concoct! Trust me. I know far more about this woman than I ever wanted to know and it is all completely frightening for those involved in her life but I digress.)
I had to get over the human factor of these people. They were human and as humans are, imperfect. They will offend, misjudge or even misinform but if I knew this and remembered this, the church was fine.

When I stumbled onto this ex-mormon.org website, I couldn't help but laugh and be sickened at the same time. I, of course, did as they "encouraged". I researched, read and researched some more but the difference was that I took information from both sides and decided that I wasn't going anywhere. Even more so, I became outraged that there are people in this world whose sole purpose in life is in working to destroy something for me, when I was very happy with it.

I'm not un-intelligent. I'm not brain-washed. I used my own mind (as I had in my teens when I sought religious answers) and I came to the same conclusion. The church may not be perfect but I have a good life. I don't suffer from depression because "I can't live up the Mormon standards of a Mormon wife" as one woman stated in a post. (Seriously, this isn't a Mormon issue, you have a self-esteem problem and need a psychologist. You are worrying too much about living up to "someone's expectations" not the Church in itself. I guess when you try too hard to belong and you feel you don't - that can do that to someone if they aren't secure in themselves. Guess she found a place of universal acceptance in these anti-Mormon bigots.) I am not disenfranchised with changes that happened over the years. (Are Catholics really upset over new doctrine as it comes from the Vatican- birth control??? How about not being able to murder non-believers anymore?) Change is expected and I am perfectly okay with that. Be realistic for crying out loud!! The main basic principles remain the same.

Now there is the DNA, archeolicigal finds "TO DATE"... yadda, yadda, yadda. As a scientist- you must know that you don't know it all. At one time, well respected scientists believed the world was flat. They didn't believe in the existence of certain things because there was no proof- but WOW when you found it...
The bible can't be completely proven factual and here's the kicker. It is the nature of most religions to work on (pay attention- big deal here) FAITH! Just because I can't see it, touch it, taste it, smell it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There are historical inaccuracies in the Torah, in the bible, (much harder to find surprisingly than anti-mormon sites but the information does exist)
If you use the bible in any way in ANY religion, you are wrong, based on the same precepts of these anti-mormon sites. If you leave and become agnostic, I can respect that a little more but if you're an ex-mormon run off to be a Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, etc. then you are still apparently disillusioned and still in need of "recovery" because the same arguments exists with other religions.

And I need to correct a few things. Not everyone visiting these sites are there to leave the church. I would be inclined to believe that curiosity about these people who hate us so much that they would stand outside our places of worship to give us their propraganda, is a strong driving factor on the hits. If you are a Mormon who disagrees, you can't post on their boards either. So you wouldn't even have known we were there or why.

Another correction, many of our members are well-educated, intelligent, people capable of and excercising free thought. Because we remain members, doesn't mean that we are stupid or under the spell of the church. I am more inclined to believe that many of the people who end up in these anti-mormon sites, were really just looking for something to fulfill them, never realizing that self-love is the most important thing they ever could have explored. They are still looking for something outside themselves to fulfill them.

Lastly, I don't have to agree with everything. To quote South Park (a pretty funny episode and one that I am able to laugh at myself with)
“Look, maybe us Mormons do believe in crazy stories that make absolutely no sense, and maybe Joseph Smith did make it all up, but I have a great life and a great family, and I have the Book of Mormon to thank for that. The truth is, I don't care if Joseph Smith made it all up, because what the church teaches now is loving your family, being nice and helping people. And even though people in this town might think that's stupid, I still choose to believe in it. All I ever did was try to be your friend, Stan, but you're so high and mighty you couldn't look past my religion and just be my friend back. You've got a lot of growing up to do, buddy. Suck my balls.”

(as a postscript- I've read the arguments against the validity of the Book of Mormon. Now, if you are an ex-mormon or thinking that the facts you've read are just to overwhelming- go here... http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml

Sunday, August 15, 2004

Statements out of Context of course can be damning

Further commentary on this ever so popular if not ridiculous e-mail, (Where Bush got his Marching orders)
http://snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
Amazing how the light changes when you put everything into focus...

Where Bush Got his Marching Orders

I recently received the e-mail that blamed the WMD claims that led us to war and spent some time responding. I felt it deserved a bigger audience...
In 1998- Iraq had confirmed weapons of mass destruction. There was no question about it. During 1991-1998, UN inspectors supervised the destruction or accounted for 817 of 819 Russian-supplied SCUD missiles; 19 transporter/erector/ launchers (TELs); and 30 chemical/biological warheads. In 1999, Iraq was refusing to allow weapons inspectors back into Iraq. (During which time Madeleine Albright made her statement) I couldn’t say with certainty that Bush lied (it is distinctly possible that he and his administration put too much blind faith in the bad information they were being fed) about Iraq and the WMDs, nor do I believe that any of the quoted Democrats believed that they were lying when they made their statements in 2002 but I can say with utmost certainty, the CIA screwed up. The rest is all speculation.

In 2002, (during the same months that many made their statements quoted in the e-mail) - CIA reports stated that “Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions.” Leading to many of the statements made in 2002 by members of all parties. (75 senators approved the war with Iraq based on flawed reports) The findings were provided to members of congress to support the decision to go into Iraq. In fact the statement made by Sen Robert Byrd (in the forwarded e-mail) is almost a verbatim statement from this report. http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm#01
Other supporting reports for our going into Iraq was removed by the CIA from their website but then restored. The original web address was http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/iraqi_mobile_plants/index.html but later restored to web address http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraqi_mobile_plants/index.html this was the report that claimed, "Coalition forces have uncovered the strongest evidence to date that Iraq was hiding a biological warfare program" detailing the “mobile WMD units”. In October 2003 David Kay of the CIA states to the Senate select committee, “The report does not represent a final reckoning of Iraq's WMD programs, nor are we at the point where we are prepared to close the file on any of these programs… inspectors had to draw conclusions as to the status of Iraq's WMD program in the face of incomplete, and often false, data supplied by Iraq or data collected either by UN/IAEA inspectors operating within the severe constraints that Iraqi security and deception actions imposed or by national intelligence collection systems with their own inherent limitations.”
Not exactly the confident belief that they had them and we had to go in to stop them.

The senate intelligence report ( a bipartisan committee) issued on July 9th, 2004, concluded that the U.S. intelligence community overstated the threat Saddam posed to the U.S. and used less than credible information to justify the war in Iraq.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), (quoted in the referenced e-mail in 2002) then stated “"The fact is, the administration, at all levels and to some extent, us [Congress], used bad information to bolster its case for war, And we in Congress would not have authorized that war — we would not have authorized that war with 75 votes — if we knew what we know now." The White house did publicly admit that information stating Iraq tried to buy uranium was based on forged documents. And then Donald Rumsfeld said last July, “It was increased worries about terrorism, not new evidence of Iraqi preparations, that was the key reason for going to war” and that "The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.”
Yet several key people, including President Bush, publicly referenced new evidence of WMDs. (Bush in his state of the union address, Colin Powell on the mobile transports,) Bush- "Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons." United Nations Address September 12, 2002,
"Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those weapons." "We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have." Radio Address October 5, 2002,
"The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his "nuclear mujahideen" - his nuclear holy warriors. Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." Cincinnati, Ohio Speech October 7, 2002
There is no way to know if Bush truly knew that he was referencing false information. However, if we are not to hold him responsible for due diligence then those whom he has placed in positions to represent him, need to be held accountable. Donald Rumsfeld makes a statement easily disputed that we did not go to war based on new threats. Yet, many statements made during that critical time elude exactly to that new threat.
Yes, I would like to know, who's lying??